« Sand+bacteria+urine= bricks: continuing performances of bacillus pasteurii | Main | On the road - SciFoo »

July 22, 2010


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Interesting too that traditional design so closely approximated technical findings, as in this example of a fond early memory:

Greetings, Michael. I have been keeping up with your postings, and greatly enjoyed the set on writing a successful work of popular science.
Best wishes,

Greetings Richard - and thanks for the analogy. I hadn't even thought of the design correlation with those toy snakes - but I remember them well myself!

I thought you had another entry related to this aside from the one at your link:

Apparently, my memory is still intact. :)

The tight coupling between modeling and experimentation is a really fantastic situation when it comes along. I'm sure it would be difficult to accomplish in some studies, but certainly more researchers could bring these together more often. Perhaps I have always been naive, but I have always thought that this was the core of the scientific method.

Hmmm! That's a creative ideas to use robot for right purpose.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Blog about copy
Share |
Cover 2